<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Photo Detective with Maureen A. Taylor - photo news</title>
    <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/</link>
    <description />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>F+W Media</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:47:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>mtaylor@taylorandstrong.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>mtaylor@taylorandstrong.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=31df56aa-7ca5-490d-b2f1-fd0c1e2f39fa</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,31df56aa-7ca5-490d-b2f1-fd0c1e2f39fa.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,31df56aa-7ca5-490d-b2f1-fd0c1e2f39fa.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=31df56aa-7ca5-490d-b2f1-fd0c1e2f39fa</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Yesterday's <i>New York Times</i> featured
an article, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/25/fashion/25facebook.html?_r=1&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=Guardians%20of%20their%20smiles&amp;st=cse" target="blank">Guardians
Of Their Smiles</a>, on the uses and abuses of photo sites. In it, a woman had posted
baby pictures to Flickr without using the privacy settings, and later discovered that
someone had used her daughter's pictures on a social networking site in Brazil.  
<br /><br />
The article mentioned several other examples, including a father who posted a video
of a school play on a video site. Parents of the other kids complained and demanded
he take it down. 
<br /><br />
So here's the question: "How do you safeguard your online photo identity?" 
<br /><ul><li>
Start by reading the fine print before clicking the "I Agree" box for any website.
You might be allowing others to copy and use your family photographs. Sure, sites
like the Library of Congress use <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/">Flickr</a> to
promote their photo collections, but those images are in the public domain. 
<br /><br /></li><li>
Use privacy settings. You can disable those public features on popular sites by finding
their privacy controls and activating them. On <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFVgQ_zba6s">YouTube</a>,
you can privately share videos or prevent downloading/sharing online. 
<br /><br /></li><li>
If you want to publish photos of an event, either have folks sign a model release
that states how and where you'll publish those images, or don't show faces. A few
months ago, I gave a workshop for kids and I really wanted to show off their genealogy
artwork in my e-newsletter. Since I didn't want to use their faces, I had the kids
hold up their projects in front of their faces. I used the picture, but didn't name
the kids. Basically, don't use images without permission. 
<br /><br /></li><li>
Watch for right-click copying. You can copy all kinds of things on the web by right-clicking
with your mouse (control-clicking on a Mac). Should you? No. It's a ethical thing.
I use a photo site that allows me to turn off the right-click option. Family members
can order prints if they want to, but not copy the images. You also can put a watermark
on images to discourage usage. It's an option in many types of photo editing software,
that's what many photo stock houses do. 
<br /><br /></li><li>
Don't put high-resolution images online. For online use, you don't need to use an
image at more than 72 dpi. This doesn't prevent online copying, but at that resolution,
print quality is awful. 
<br /></li></ul>
The <i>New York Times</i> article was a cautionary tale for anyone posting images
online.  You can sound off in the comment section below or on the <a href="http://forum.familytreemagazine.com/forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=2119&amp;posts=1#M4943">Photo
Detective Forum</a>. 
<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=31df56aa-7ca5-490d-b2f1-fd0c1e2f39fa" /></body>
      <title>Photo Sites: Read the Fine Print</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,31df56aa-7ca5-490d-b2f1-fd0c1e2f39fa.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2009/10/26/PhotoSitesReadTheFinePrint.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:47:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Yesterday's &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; featured an article, &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/25/fashion/25facebook.html?_r=1&amp;amp;scp=1&amp;amp;sq=Guardians%20of%20their%20smiles&amp;amp;st=cse" target="blank"&gt;Guardians
Of Their Smiles&lt;/a&gt;, on the uses and abuses of photo sites. In it, a woman had posted
baby pictures to Flickr without using the privacy settings, and later discovered that
someone had used her daughter's pictures on a social networking site in Brazil.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The article mentioned several other examples, including a father who posted a video
of a school play on a video site. Parents of the other kids complained and demanded
he take it down. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So here's the question: "How do you safeguard your online photo identity?" 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Start by reading the fine print before clicking the "I Agree" box for any website.
You might be allowing others to copy and use your family photographs. Sure, sites
like the Library of Congress use &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/"&gt;Flickr&lt;/a&gt; to
promote their photo collections, but those images are in the public domain. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Use privacy settings. You can disable those public features on popular sites by finding
their privacy controls and activating them. On &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFVgQ_zba6s"&gt;YouTube&lt;/a&gt;,
you can privately share videos or prevent downloading/sharing online. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
If you want to publish photos of an event, either have folks sign a model release
that states how and where you'll publish those images, or don't show faces. A few
months ago, I gave a workshop for kids and I really wanted to show off their genealogy
artwork in my e-newsletter. Since I didn't want to use their faces, I had the kids
hold up their projects in front of their faces. I used the picture, but didn't name
the kids. Basically, don't use images without permission. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Watch for right-click copying. You can copy all kinds of things on the web by right-clicking
with your mouse (control-clicking on a Mac). Should you? No. It's a ethical thing.
I use a photo site that allows me to turn off the right-click option. Family members
can order prints if they want to, but not copy the images. You also can put a watermark
on images to discourage usage. It's an option in many types of photo editing software,
that's what many photo stock houses do. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Don't put high-resolution images online. For online use, you don't need to use an
image at more than 72 dpi. This doesn't prevent online copying, but at that resolution,
print quality is awful. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
The &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; article was a cautionary tale for anyone posting images
online.&amp;nbsp; You can sound off in the comment section below or on the &lt;a href="http://forum.familytreemagazine.com/forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=2119&amp;amp;posts=1#M4943"&gt;Photo
Detective Forum&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=31df56aa-7ca5-490d-b2f1-fd0c1e2f39fa" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,31df56aa-7ca5-490d-b2f1-fd0c1e2f39fa.aspx</comments>
      <category>photo news</category>
      <category>Photo-sharing sites</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=06879e39-15b1-4f3b-884b-d7ad8bcfa93e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,06879e39-15b1-4f3b-884b-d7ad8bcfa93e.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,06879e39-15b1-4f3b-884b-d7ad8bcfa93e.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=06879e39-15b1-4f3b-884b-d7ad8bcfa93e</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">If you've ever tried to copy a family photo
at a store or photo lab and been denied due to copyright issues, there's an article
you might be interested in. 
<br /><br />
On July 19, the <i>New York Times</i> published an article about photos on Wikipedia, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/20/arts/20funny.html?hpw">"Wikipedia
May Be a Font of Facts but It's a Desert for Photos."</a><br /><br />
If you've used this vast internet archive of user-contributed material, you know the
picture quality/quantity is iffy. That's because these are "unofficial" photos anyone
can use. According to the article, the site uses a "<a href="http://creativecommons.org/">Creative
Commons</a> license, which allows anyone to use an image, for commercial purposes
or not, as long as the photographer is credited." It's a bit more complicated, but
the article explains it.  
<br /><br />
There are legal and common-sense rules relating to photo usage. Basically, the store
with the photo kiosk denied you the right to copy your picture because the photographer
holds the reproduction rights for it. Even if the photographer is deceased or you
don't know who it was, as for an old family portrait, the store might decide it doesn't
want to take the chance.<br /><br />
A handy guide for when you need formal permission to use an image appears in Sharon
DeBartolo Carmack's <i>Carmack's Guide to Copyright &amp; Contracts: A Pricer for
Genealogists, Writers &amp; Researchers</i> (GPC, $15.95) 
<br /><br />
Here's a common sense rule for internet usage of family photos. If you want to post
a photo of a living family member on your Web site or FaceBook page, make sure you
have that person's permission, too. It's a common courtesy. 
<p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=06879e39-15b1-4f3b-884b-d7ad8bcfa93e" /></body>
      <title>Photos on the Web: Copyright Woes</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,06879e39-15b1-4f3b-884b-d7ad8bcfa93e.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2009/07/21/PhotosOnTheWebCopyrightWoes.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:55:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>If you've ever tried to copy a family photo at a store or photo lab and been denied due to copyright issues, there's an article you might be interested in. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On July 19, the &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; published an article about photos on Wikipedia, &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/20/arts/20funny.html?hpw"&gt;"Wikipedia
May Be a Font of Facts but It's a Desert for Photos."&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you've used this vast internet archive of user-contributed material, you know the
picture quality/quantity is iffy. That's because these are "unofficial" photos anyone
can use. According to the article, the site uses a "&lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/"&gt;Creative
Commons&lt;/a&gt; license, which allows anyone to use an image, for commercial purposes
or not, as long as the photographer is credited." It's a bit more complicated, but
the article explains it.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There are legal and common-sense rules relating to photo usage. Basically, the store
with the photo kiosk denied you the right to copy your picture because the photographer
holds the reproduction rights for it. Even if the photographer is deceased or you
don't know who it was, as for an old family portrait, the store might decide it doesn't
want to take the chance.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A handy guide for when you need formal permission to use an image appears in Sharon
DeBartolo Carmack's &lt;i&gt;Carmack's Guide to Copyright &amp;amp; Contracts: A Pricer for
Genealogists, Writers &amp;amp; Researchers&lt;/i&gt; (GPC, $15.95) 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here's a common sense rule for internet usage of family photos. If you want to post
a photo of a living family member on your Web site or FaceBook page, make sure you
have that person's permission, too. It's a common courtesy. 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=06879e39-15b1-4f3b-884b-d7ad8bcfa93e" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,06879e39-15b1-4f3b-884b-d7ad8bcfa93e.aspx</comments>
      <category>photo news</category>
      <category>Photo-sharing sites</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=f2ede2b7-3110-4287-8633-b4b0c1b639f9</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,f2ede2b7-3110-4287-8633-b4b0c1b639f9.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,f2ede2b7-3110-4287-8633-b4b0c1b639f9.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f2ede2b7-3110-4287-8633-b4b0c1b639f9</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>A big thank you to Diane for posting a couple of pictures in this space <a href="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Wish+I+Were+There.aspx">last
week.</a>  London was fantastic! I'm a bit jet-lagged from the travel and tired
(but excited) about all the things I saw at the <a href="http://www.whodoyouthinkyouarelive.co.uk/">Who
Do You Think You Are? Live</a> show last weekend.  This is an event I've wanted
to attend for a couple of years, but the timing was never right.  However, this
year's schedule was perfect.  
<br /><br />
While WDYTYA is really a trade show, there are a few different lecture tracks. Some
are even free.  At American genealogy conferences you pay a general admission
fee, but at the London event you only purchase tickets for specific lectures on a
first-come first-served basis. 
<br /><br />
If you took a look at the <a href="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Wish+I+Were+There.aspx">two
pictures</a> you get a sense of just how popular this event is. The Facebook friends
I posed with wanted to get there early. We waited in line for about an hour, but it
was worth it.  Guess who secured the number one spots in the queque?  We
did. 
<br /><br />
When the doors opened we were ready. Estimates for Saturday's attendance were as high
as four thousand people. On Saturday the crowds were even larger and the line continued
around the building even at noon. Each new Olympia/Kensington train brought loads
of new folks to the event.  I have lots to share over the next few weeks.  
<br /><br />
I'll start with a few photos so you can get a sense of the size and scope of the show. 
<br /><br /><img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/IMG_3292.JPG" alt="IMG_3292.JPG" border="0" height="255" width="340" /><br />
Here's one of the free lectures taught by <a href="http://www.findmypast.com">FindMyPast.com</a>.<br /><br /><img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/IMG_3290.JPG" alt="IMG_3290.JPG" border="0" height="255" width="340" /><br /><br />
2009 is the year of the Gathering in Scotland. I spend some time in the booth talking
about my McDuff line. He told me that there currently isn't a Chieftain of the McDuff
clan. <a href="http://www.visitscotland.com/shop/holiday-packages/gathering/">The
Gathering</a> brings all the clans together for events. I put my name in for a free
drawing. My fingers are crossed.&lt;smile&gt;.<br /><br /><img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/IMG_3306.JPG" alt="IMG_3306.JPG" border="0" height="255" width="340" /><br />
The crowds on day 2. 
<br /><br />
I'll be back in the next few weeks with more.  I'll also post an album on my
FaceBook profile. 
<br /><br />
I can't wait until next year!<br /><p></p></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=f2ede2b7-3110-4287-8633-b4b0c1b639f9" />
      </body>
      <title>London Wrap-Up Part 1</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,f2ede2b7-3110-4287-8633-b4b0c1b639f9.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2009/03/02/LondonWrapUpPart1.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:03:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A big thank you to Diane for posting a couple of pictures in this space &lt;a href="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Wish+I+Were+There.aspx"&gt;last
week.&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; London was fantastic! I'm a bit jet-lagged from the travel and tired
(but excited) about all the things I saw at the &lt;a href="http://www.whodoyouthinkyouarelive.co.uk/"&gt;Who
Do You Think You Are? Live&lt;/a&gt; show last weekend.&amp;nbsp; This is an event I've wanted
to attend for a couple of years, but the timing was never right.&amp;nbsp; However, this
year's schedule was perfect.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
While WDYTYA is really a trade show, there are a few different lecture tracks. Some
are even free.&amp;nbsp; At American genealogy conferences you pay a general admission
fee, but at the London event you only purchase tickets for specific lectures on a
first-come first-served basis. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you took a look at the &lt;a href="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Wish+I+Were+There.aspx"&gt;two
pictures&lt;/a&gt; you get a sense of just how popular this event is. The Facebook friends
I posed with wanted to get there early. We waited in line for about an hour, but it
was worth it.&amp;nbsp; Guess who secured the number one spots in the queque?&amp;nbsp; We
did. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
When the doors opened we were ready. Estimates for Saturday's attendance were as high
as four thousand people. On Saturday the crowds were even larger and the line continued
around the building even at noon. Each new Olympia/Kensington train brought loads
of new folks to the event.&amp;nbsp; I have lots to share over the next few weeks.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'll start with a few photos so you can get a sense of the size and scope of the show. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/IMG_3292.JPG" alt="IMG_3292.JPG" border="0" height="255" width="340"&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;
Here's one of the free lectures taught by &lt;a href="http://www.findmypast.com"&gt;FindMyPast.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/IMG_3290.JPG" alt="IMG_3290.JPG" border="0" height="255" width="340"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2009 is the year of the Gathering in Scotland. I spend some time in the booth talking
about my McDuff line. He told me that there currently isn't a Chieftain of the McDuff
clan. &lt;a href="http://www.visitscotland.com/shop/holiday-packages/gathering/"&gt;The
Gathering&lt;/a&gt; brings all the clans together for events. I put my name in for a free
drawing. My fingers are crossed.&amp;lt;smile&amp;gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/IMG_3306.JPG" alt="IMG_3306.JPG" border="0" height="255" width="340"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The crowds on day 2. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'll be back in the next few weeks with more.&amp;nbsp; I'll also post an album on my
FaceBook profile. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I can't wait until next year!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=f2ede2b7-3110-4287-8633-b4b0c1b639f9" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,f2ede2b7-3110-4287-8633-b4b0c1b639f9.aspx</comments>
      <category>Genealogy events</category>
      <category>photo news</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=9f70f4b9-184c-43a6-a42b-bb0a58041f8a</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,9f70f4b9-184c-43a6-a42b-bb0a58041f8a.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,9f70f4b9-184c-43a6-a42b-bb0a58041f8a.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=9f70f4b9-184c-43a6-a42b-bb0a58041f8a</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>As readers of this blog know, I had a booth at last week's <a href="http://fgs.org">Federation
of Genealogical Societies</a> conference. 
<br /><br />
Wow! A lot of you stopped by to say hello and share your photo stories. Yes, some
people brought photos with them, too &lt;smile&gt;. I also got to meet several FaceBook
friends and fans. It was a tremendous amount of fun and very exhausting. Thank you
for visiting with me!<br /><br />
My train ride home during Tropical Storm Hanna was something I'm not going to forget
for a very long time. Who knew it could take 11 hours to go from Philadelphia to Boston?
A series of misadventures, including the train hitting a tree across the tracks, made
for a lively overnight experience. 
<br /><br />
My favorite part of the conference (aside from meeting all the readers of <i>Family
Tree Magazine</i> in attendance) was walking around the exhibit hall checking out
news at the booths. 
<br /><br />
For instance, I got to meet Kim Screen of <a href="http://www.good-stock.com/blog">Good
Stock Press &amp; Bindery</a>. This creative woman takes family history publishing
to a new level. Yes, her books are expensive, but the final product is worth every
penny. She produces limited edition books (and other heirloom items) that are so beautiful
you can't help but flip through them. Her illustrated family histories are particularly
wonderful. Her clients provide all the text, photos and other illustrations and Kim
transforms their genealogy into a work of family history art.  
<br /><br />
My advice...spend some time on her Web site and explore the creative possibilities
for your family history publishing endeavor. I know I will. 
<p></p></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=9f70f4b9-184c-43a6-a42b-bb0a58041f8a" />
      </body>
      <title>FGS  Wrap-up</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,9f70f4b9-184c-43a6-a42b-bb0a58041f8a.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2008/09/07/FGSWrapup.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;As readers of this blog know, I had a booth at last week's &lt;a href="http://fgs.org"&gt;Federation
of Genealogical Societies&lt;/a&gt; conference. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Wow! A lot of you stopped by to say hello and share your photo stories. Yes, some
people brought photos with them, too &amp;lt;smile&amp;gt;. I also got to meet several FaceBook
friends and fans. It was a tremendous amount of fun and very exhausting. Thank you
for visiting with me!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My train ride home during Tropical Storm Hanna was something I'm not going to forget
for a very long time. Who knew it could take 11 hours to go from Philadelphia to Boston?
A series of misadventures, including the train hitting a tree across the tracks, made
for a lively overnight experience. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My favorite part of the conference (aside from meeting all the readers of &lt;i&gt;Family
Tree Magazine&lt;/i&gt; in attendance) was walking around the exhibit hall checking out
news at the booths. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For instance, I got to meet Kim Screen of &lt;a href="http://www.good-stock.com/blog"&gt;Good
Stock Press &amp;amp; Bindery&lt;/a&gt;. This creative woman takes family history publishing
to a new level. Yes, her books are expensive, but the final product is worth every
penny. She produces limited edition books (and other heirloom items) that are so beautiful
you can't help but flip through them. Her illustrated family histories are particularly
wonderful. Her clients provide all the text, photos and other illustrations and Kim
transforms their genealogy into a work of family history art.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My advice...spend some time on her Web site and explore the creative possibilities
for your family history publishing endeavor. I know I will. 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=9f70f4b9-184c-43a6-a42b-bb0a58041f8a" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,9f70f4b9-184c-43a6-a42b-bb0a58041f8a.aspx</comments>
      <category>photo news</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=7d7185be-d108-4877-bccb-969061f5bfbe</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,7d7185be-d108-4877-bccb-969061f5bfbe.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,7d7185be-d108-4877-bccb-969061f5bfbe.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=7d7185be-d108-4877-bccb-969061f5bfbe</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>Remember how last week I mentioned that this column would feature a "viewer discretion
advised" image? The sight of a deceased person in a photo is the reason for the warning. 
<br /><br />
Like it or not, our ancestors began photographing the dead members of their family
in the early 1840s. If you think you'll find such an image disturbing or unsettling,
please don't continue reading.  
<br /><br />
Theresa Klepadlo-Berio submitted this photo with the following e-mail message: "I
have had this photograph for years and have always wondered it it's an actual funeral
or what...All I know is that it was in an old photo album of my grandparents' and
they were from Poland."<br /><br /><img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/terri082508weird.jpg" alt="terri082508weird.jpg" border="0" height="181" width="269" /><br /><br />
It is in fact a funeral. The elderly woman in the casket is being photographed before
her burial. The people surrounding her are probably family members. This picture is
a key to her family history in Poland, and a a great example of how one photograph
can help you connect with your heritage. 
<br /><br />
I spent a bit of time fixing the contrast and adjusting the sharpness of this image
using my favorite photo editing tool—<a href="http://www.picnik.com" target="blank">Picnik</a>.
(It's free!) Once I improved the picture the markings on the side of the coffin jumped
out at me.<br /><br /><img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/terri082508weird2.jpg" alt="terri082508weird2.jpg" border="0" height="75" width="200" /><br /><br />
The words are still very difficult to read, but I took a chance and entered what I
thought I saw into <a href="http://google.com" target="blank">Google</a>. Eureka!
The words are <i>spoczywaj w pokoju pax</i>. 
<br /><br />
On the <a href="http://http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/%7Ecemetery/pennsylvania/translate-polish.htm">Pennsylvania
USGenWeb Tombstone Transcription Project </a>Web site was a translation: "Rest in
Peace." A closeup of the woman's hands isn't clear enough for reproduction here, but
she's holding a cloth and either a book or a photograph.<br /><br />
I immediately called Terri and asked her more about her family. Turns out there's
a family tradition of photographing the dead! This is the only postmortem picture
in her collection, but as we chatted she mentioned that her father's family used to
pose relatives around the deceased. That suggests that this image here contains at
least a few relatives. But who? 
<br /><br />
That's something I hope to write more about in the near future. Terri's going to send
me some information on her family history. With any luck we'll be able to figure out
who's who and when this was taken. 
<br /><br />
This image is also a good example of how the picture is just one piece of the family
puzzle. Forensic research is needed to put the whole story together. More later...<br /><br />
In a related piece of news, a story this month in the <i><a href="http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2008/aug/17/a-love-eternal/" target="blank">Ventura
County Star</a></i> focused on one photographer's fine art pictures of parents with
their deceased infants. Historically, mothers have long posed for a final picture
with their deceased infants. The imges are usually heartbreaking and really upsetting
to view. However, photographer <a href="http://web.mac.com/leilaj/lj/Leila_Jones_Photography.html" target="blank">Leila
Jones'</a> work at the Simi Valley Hospital transcends the grief.  She does an
amazing job of capturing these last moments. 
<br /><font color="#000080"><font size="5"></font></font><p></p></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=7d7185be-d108-4877-bccb-969061f5bfbe" />
      </body>
      <title>Postmortem Images</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,7d7185be-d108-4877-bccb-969061f5bfbe.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2008/08/26/PostmortemImages.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:18:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Remember how last week I mentioned that this column would feature a "viewer discretion
advised" image? The sight of a deceased person in a photo is the reason for the warning. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Like it or not, our ancestors began photographing the dead members of their family
in the early 1840s. If you think you'll find such an image disturbing or unsettling,
please don't continue reading.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Theresa Klepadlo-Berio submitted this photo with the following e-mail message: "I
have had this photograph for years and have always wondered it it's an actual funeral
or what...All I know is that it was in an old photo album of my grandparents' and
they were from Poland."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/terri082508weird.jpg" alt="terri082508weird.jpg" border="0" height="181" width="269"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It is in fact a funeral. The elderly woman in the casket is being photographed before
her burial. The people surrounding her are probably family members. This picture is
a key to her family history in Poland, and a a great example of how one photograph
can help you connect with your heritage. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I spent a bit of time fixing the contrast and adjusting the sharpness of this image
using my favorite photo editing tool—&lt;a href="http://www.picnik.com" target="blank"&gt;Picnik&lt;/a&gt;.
(It's free!) Once I improved the picture the markings on the side of the coffin jumped
out at me.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/terri082508weird2.jpg" alt="terri082508weird2.jpg" border="0" height="75" width="200"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The words are still very difficult to read, but I took a chance and entered what I
thought I saw into &lt;a href="http://google.com" target="blank"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;. Eureka!
The words are &lt;i&gt;spoczywaj w pokoju pax&lt;/i&gt;. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On the &lt;a href="http://http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/%7Ecemetery/pennsylvania/translate-polish.htm"&gt;Pennsylvania
USGenWeb Tombstone Transcription Project &lt;/a&gt;Web site was a translation: "Rest in
Peace." A closeup of the woman's hands isn't clear enough for reproduction here, but
she's holding a cloth and either a book or a photograph.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I immediately called Terri and asked her more about her family. Turns out there's
a family tradition of photographing the dead! This is the only postmortem picture
in her collection, but as we chatted she mentioned that her father's family used to
pose relatives around the deceased. That suggests that this image here contains at
least a few relatives. But who? 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That's something I hope to write more about in the near future. Terri's going to send
me some information on her family history. With any luck we'll be able to figure out
who's who and when this was taken. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This image is also a good example of how the picture is just one piece of the family
puzzle. Forensic research is needed to put the whole story together. More later...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In a related piece of news, a story this month in the &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2008/aug/17/a-love-eternal/" target="blank"&gt;Ventura
County Star&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; focused on one photographer's fine art pictures of parents with
their deceased infants. Historically, mothers have long posed for a final picture
with their deceased infants. The imges are usually heartbreaking and really upsetting
to view. However, photographer &lt;a href="http://web.mac.com/leilaj/lj/Leila_Jones_Photography.html" target="blank"&gt;Leila
Jones'&lt;/a&gt; work at the Simi Valley Hospital transcends the grief.&amp;nbsp; She does an
amazing job of capturing these last moments. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;font color="#000080"&gt;&lt;font size="5"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=7d7185be-d108-4877-bccb-969061f5bfbe" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,7d7185be-d108-4877-bccb-969061f5bfbe.aspx</comments>
      <category>photo news</category>
      <category>Photos from abroad</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=4ccfd52c-cdfd-46e6-9cf1-2366eec0618b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,4ccfd52c-cdfd-46e6-9cf1-2366eec0618b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,4ccfd52c-cdfd-46e6-9cf1-2366eec0618b.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=4ccfd52c-cdfd-46e6-9cf1-2366eec0618b</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>I'll be at the <a href="http://www.fgsconference.org/">Federation of Genealogical
Societies Conference </a>in Philadelphia Sept. 2-6, and I hope I'll see you there.
You can visit with me in my booth, #304, in the conference exhibit hall. It's a great
chance to chat with me about your family photos or just stop by to say hi. Please
do! I like meeting the folks who submit photos to this column.  
<br /><br />
At the conference, I'll also be presenting a workshop on identifying and preserving
family photos. It's not too late to sign up for this special offering. You can <a href="http://www.fgsconference.org/registration/">register
for the conference online</a> until Aug. 22 at 5 p.m. Central time.   
<br /><br />
Last week the e-zine/blog <a href="http://http://www.shadesofthedeparted.com/2008/08/august-15-friday-from-collectors.html#comment-form"></a><a href="http://www.shadesofthedeparted.com/2008/08/august-15-friday-from-collectors.html">Shades
of the Departed</a> asked me to write a short piece about the wedding photos I collect.
I met the author of this informative and wonderful photo site, <a href="http://www.footnotemaven.com">The
Footnote Maven</a>, through FaceBook. We're kindred spirits when it comes to old photos.
Check out the story. I talk about seven of the images from my personal (though not
my family) collection. If you've ever cried at wedding, then be advised. You'll need
a tissue. 
<br /><br />
Next week I'll feature a photo in this space that'll carry a warning, "Viewer discretion
advised." Now doesn't that pique your interest!<br /><br /><p></p></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=4ccfd52c-cdfd-46e6-9cf1-2366eec0618b" />
      </body>
      <title>Meet the Photo Detective, Online and at FGS</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,4ccfd52c-cdfd-46e6-9cf1-2366eec0618b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2008/08/18/MeetThePhotoDetectiveOnlineAndAtFGS.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:12:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'll be at the &lt;a href="http://www.fgsconference.org/"&gt;Federation of Genealogical
Societies Conference &lt;/a&gt;in Philadelphia Sept. 2-6, and I hope I'll see you there.
You can visit with me in my booth, #304, in the conference exhibit hall. It's a great
chance to chat with me about your family photos or just stop by to say hi. Please
do! I like meeting the folks who submit photos to this column.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
At the conference, I'll also be presenting a workshop on identifying and preserving
family photos. It's not too late to sign up for this special offering. You can &lt;a href="http://www.fgsconference.org/registration/"&gt;register
for the conference online&lt;/a&gt; until Aug. 22 at 5 p.m. Central time.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Last week the e-zine/blog&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://http://www.shadesofthedeparted.com/2008/08/august-15-friday-from-collectors.html#comment-form"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.shadesofthedeparted.com/2008/08/august-15-friday-from-collectors.html"&gt;Shades
of the Departed&lt;/a&gt; asked me to write a short piece about the wedding photos I collect.
I met the author of this informative and wonderful photo site, &lt;a href="http://www.footnotemaven.com"&gt;The
Footnote Maven&lt;/a&gt;, through FaceBook. We're kindred spirits when it comes to old photos.
Check out the story. I talk about seven of the images from my personal (though not
my family) collection. If you've ever cried at wedding, then be advised. You'll need
a tissue. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Next week I'll feature a photo in this space that'll carry a warning, "Viewer discretion
advised." Now doesn't that pique your interest!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=4ccfd52c-cdfd-46e6-9cf1-2366eec0618b" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,4ccfd52c-cdfd-46e6-9cf1-2366eec0618b.aspx</comments>
      <category>photo news</category>
      <category>Web sites</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=2b85e985-bc0b-4e9b-8db3-64ec74efd1b1</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,2b85e985-bc0b-4e9b-8db3-64ec74efd1b1.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,2b85e985-bc0b-4e9b-8db3-64ec74efd1b1.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=2b85e985-bc0b-4e9b-8db3-64ec74efd1b1</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>Do you have shoeboxes filled with unidentified family photographs? Let photo
historian Maureen A. Taylor lend a hand.<br /><br />
You can submit a mystery photograph for Taylor to analyze online in the Photo Detective
blog or in <i>Family Tree Magazine</i>'s print Photo Detective column.<br />
See the <a href="../photodetectiveblog">Photo Detective blog</a> for examples of the
kind of information Taylor may be able to provide about your image.<br /><br />
Taylor will contact you by e-mail or phone if your submission is chosen for analysis.
In that case, <i>Family Tree Magazine</i> may publish the picture and Taylor's professional
analysis containing your name and the names of any relevant deceased ancestors on
this blog or in the magazine.<br /><br />
Please note that by submitting your image, you grant <i>Family Tree Magazine</i> permission
to use it in any and all print, online and promotional materials.<br /><br /><b>How to submit photos by e-mail</b>:<br />
Scan the picture in JPG format with a resolution of 300 dpi. If there are markings
on the back, scan it as well. <a href="mailto:mtaylor@taylorandstrong.com">Send the
images to Taylor as an e-mail attachment</a> with the words <i>Family Tree Magazine</i> in
the subject line. Include the following in the body of the message:<br /><ul><li>
Your name and contact information. Taylor may need to ask you more questions about
your picture.</li><li>
Any information you have about the image, such as how it came into your possession,
who you suspect is pictured and why, the location, etc.</li><li>
Your specific question about the picture.</li></ul><b>How to submit photos by postal mail:</b><br />
Make a photographic copy of your image using a scanner or retail photo kiosk, or by
visiting a photo services lab. Using a photocopier will result in a poor-quality image
that can't be analzed. Copy the back, too, if it contains any markings. <br /><br />
Type a letter with the bulleted information above. Mail the letter and copied photo
to Photo Detective, <i>Family Tree Magazine</i>, 4700 E. Galbraith Road, Cincinnati,
OH 45236. DO NOT send your original photograph—photos will not be returned to you. 
<br /><br /><b>Disclaimers:</b><br />
Many factors come into play in identifying historical photos; therefore, <i>Family
Tree Magazine</i> can't guarantee the accuracy of an analysis. Not every submitted
photo will be analyzed. Taylor is unable provide individuals with free private analyses;
however, if you are interested in her professional photo services, please visit her <a href="http://photodetective.com/">Photo
Detective Web site</a>.  
<p></p></div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=2b85e985-bc0b-4e9b-8db3-64ec74efd1b1" />
      </body>
      <title>How to Submit Your Mystery Photo to the Photo Detective</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,2b85e985-bc0b-4e9b-8db3-64ec74efd1b1.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2008/06/01/HowToSubmitYourMysteryPhotoToThePhotoDetective.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:41:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Do you have shoeboxes filled with unidentified family photographs? Let photo
historian Maureen A. Taylor lend a hand.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You can submit a mystery photograph for Taylor to analyze online in the Photo Detective
blog or in &lt;i&gt;Family Tree Magazine&lt;/i&gt;'s print Photo Detective column.&lt;br&gt;
See the &lt;a href="../photodetectiveblog"&gt;Photo Detective blog&lt;/a&gt; for examples of the
kind of information Taylor may be able to provide about your image.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Taylor will contact you by e-mail or phone if your submission is chosen for analysis.
In that case, &lt;i&gt;Family Tree Magazine&lt;/i&gt; may publish the picture and Taylor's professional
analysis containing your name and the names of any relevant deceased ancestors on
this blog or in the magazine.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Please note that by submitting your image, you grant &lt;i&gt;Family Tree Magazine&lt;/i&gt; permission
to use it in any and all print, online and promotional materials.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;How to submit photos by e-mail&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
Scan the picture in JPG format with a resolution of 300 dpi. If there are markings
on the back, scan it as well. &lt;a href="mailto:mtaylor@taylorandstrong.com"&gt;Send the
images to Taylor as an e-mail attachment&lt;/a&gt; with the words &lt;i&gt;Family Tree Magazine&lt;/i&gt; in
the subject line. Include the following in the body of the message:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Your name and contact information. Taylor may need to ask you more questions about
your picture.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Any information you have about the image, such as how it came into your possession,
who you suspect is pictured and why, the location, etc.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Your specific question about the picture.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;b&gt;How to submit photos by postal mail:&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Make a photographic copy of your image using a scanner or retail photo kiosk, or by
visiting a photo services lab. Using a photocopier will result in a poor-quality image
that can't be analzed. Copy the back, too, if it contains any markings.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Type a letter with the bulleted information above. Mail the letter and copied photo
to&amp;nbsp;Photo Detective, &lt;i&gt;Family Tree Magazine&lt;/i&gt;, 4700 E. Galbraith Road, Cincinnati,
OH 45236. DO NOT send your original photograph—photos will not be returned to you. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Disclaimers:&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Many factors come into play in identifying historical photos; therefore, &lt;i&gt;Family
Tree Magazine&lt;/i&gt; can't guarantee the accuracy of an analysis. Not every submitted
photo will be analyzed. Taylor is unable provide individuals with free private analyses;
however, if you are interested in her professional photo services, please visit her &lt;a href="http://photodetective.com/"&gt;Photo
Detective Web site&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=2b85e985-bc0b-4e9b-8db3-64ec74efd1b1" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,2b85e985-bc0b-4e9b-8db3-64ec74efd1b1.aspx</comments>
      <category>photo news</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=af61d5c0-913c-4bfa-b1ca-7b635c5f9577</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,af61d5c0-913c-4bfa-b1ca-7b635c5f9577.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,af61d5c0-913c-4bfa-b1ca-7b635c5f9577.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=af61d5c0-913c-4bfa-b1ca-7b635c5f9577</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>This story is so good I couldn't wait until next week to blog about it. The April
17 <i>New York Times</i> ran a story, "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/arts/design/17phot.html?_r=1&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=photo+detectives&amp;st=nyt&amp;oref=slogin">An
Image is a Mystery for Photo Detectives</a>." This is one mystery I wish I was actively
working on. 
<br /><br />
Turns out <a href="http://www.rleggat.com/photohistory/history/talbot.htm">William
Fox Talbot</a> probably wasn't the first person to develop paper images. 
<br /><br />
There was a circle of friends in England who tinkered with photographic processes
as early as the 1790s. While the news doesn't change when daguerreotypes were patented
(1839), this tale of photo detecting focuses on a series of clues relating to who
took the images of leaves the <i>New York Times</i> reports on.  
<br /><br />
I've written about provenance, i.e. the trail of ownership of an heirloom or photo,
and in this one case it's key. Photo historians attributed these leaf pictures to
Talbot, but now a historian familiar with his work doesn't believe that to be true.
It's like a Pandora's Box of photo history. If this one picture isn't Talbots, then
likely several others aren't attributed properly, too. 
<br /><br />
It's a great tale. Sotheby's is going to auction some of these pieces, but right now
photo scholars are trying to figure out the true photographer. 
<p></p></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=af61d5c0-913c-4bfa-b1ca-7b635c5f9577" />
      </body>
      <title>New Discovery in Photo History</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,af61d5c0-913c-4bfa-b1ca-7b635c5f9577.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2008/04/18/NewDiscoveryInPhotoHistory.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:33:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This story is so good I couldn't wait until next week to blog about it. The April
17 &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; ran a story, "&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/arts/design/17phot.html?_r=1&amp;amp;scp=1&amp;amp;sq=photo+detectives&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;oref=slogin"&gt;An
Image is a Mystery for Photo Detectives&lt;/a&gt;." This is one mystery I wish I was actively
working on. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Turns out &lt;a href="http://www.rleggat.com/photohistory/history/talbot.htm"&gt;William
Fox Talbot&lt;/a&gt; probably wasn't the first person to develop paper images. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There was a circle of friends in England who tinkered with photographic processes
as early as the 1790s. While the news doesn't change when daguerreotypes were patented
(1839), this tale of photo detecting focuses on a series of clues relating to who
took the images of leaves the &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; reports on.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I've written about provenance, i.e. the trail of ownership of an heirloom or photo,
and in this one case it's key. Photo historians attributed these leaf pictures to
Talbot, but now a historian familiar with his work doesn't believe that to be true.
It's like a Pandora's Box of photo history. If this one picture isn't Talbots, then
likely several others aren't attributed properly, too. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It's a great tale. Sotheby's is going to auction some of these pieces, but right now
photo scholars are trying to figure out the true photographer. 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=af61d5c0-913c-4bfa-b1ca-7b635c5f9577" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,af61d5c0-913c-4bfa-b1ca-7b635c5f9577.aspx</comments>
      <category>photo news</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=b5c78a78-9f5b-4722-8ecd-ba6b85671ec0</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,b5c78a78-9f5b-4722-8ecd-ba6b85671ec0.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,b5c78a78-9f5b-4722-8ecd-ba6b85671ec0.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b5c78a78-9f5b-4722-8ecd-ba6b85671ec0</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Two weeks ago I wrote about how <a href="http://www.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Polaroid+News.aspx">Polaroid
stopped manufacturing film</a>. In the Comments section to that article, Nancy Owen
asked, "Over the years, I've taken a lot of Polaroid pictures. Many of them are not
holding up. The edges of the paper on the back are coming unglued. What can I do to
preserve my photographs?"<br /><br />
Ahh, Nancy, Polaroid pictures <i>are</i> a bit troublesome. If you've taken these
instant pictures and haven't looked at them in a while, it's time to take a peek.
These images have a tendency to fade, crack and become unglued.  
<br /><br />
The best solution is to scan them, then fix the damage using photo editing software. 
<br /><br />
Several people wrote to me privately saying how much they liked using their Polaroid
cameras. According to an article in Sunday's <a href="http://www.boston.com/ae/theater_arts/articles/2008/03/15/instant_karma/">Boston
Globe</a>, Fuji still makes instant film. You can see a selection of their products
on the <a href="http://www.fujifilmusa.com/JSP/fuji/epartners/proPhotoProductsInstant.jsp">Fuji
Web site</a>. And yes, it works in Polaroid cameras!<p></p></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=b5c78a78-9f5b-4722-8ecd-ba6b85671ec0" />
      </body>
      <title>Polaroid Preservation</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,b5c78a78-9f5b-4722-8ecd-ba6b85671ec0.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2008/03/18/PolaroidPreservation.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:44:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Two weeks ago I wrote about how &lt;a href="http://www.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Polaroid+News.aspx"&gt;Polaroid
stopped manufacturing film&lt;/a&gt;. In the Comments section to that article, Nancy Owen
asked, "Over the years, I've taken a lot of Polaroid pictures. Many of them are not
holding up. The edges of the paper on the back are coming unglued. What can I do to
preserve my photographs?"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ahh, Nancy, Polaroid pictures &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; a bit troublesome. If you've taken these
instant pictures and haven't looked at them in a while, it's time to take a peek.
These images have a tendency to fade, crack and become unglued.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The best solution is to scan them, then fix the damage using photo editing software. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Several people wrote to me privately saying how much they liked using their Polaroid
cameras. According to an article in Sunday's &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/ae/theater_arts/articles/2008/03/15/instant_karma/"&gt;Boston
Globe&lt;/a&gt;, Fuji still makes instant film. You can see a selection of their products
on the &lt;a href="http://www.fujifilmusa.com/JSP/fuji/epartners/proPhotoProductsInstant.jsp"&gt;Fuji
Web site&lt;/a&gt;. And yes, it works in Polaroid cameras!&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=b5c78a78-9f5b-4722-8ecd-ba6b85671ec0" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,b5c78a78-9f5b-4722-8ecd-ba6b85671ec0.aspx</comments>
      <category>photo news</category>
      <category>preserving photos</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=c782263e-20e9-4a01-a0a9-f5b271a5a0bc</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,c782263e-20e9-4a01-a0a9-f5b271a5a0bc.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,c782263e-20e9-4a01-a0a9-f5b271a5a0bc.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c782263e-20e9-4a01-a0a9-f5b271a5a0bc</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>Another photographic giant is shutting down production on one of its products.
In mid-February, <a href="http://www.polaroid.com/us/index.jsp?co=us&amp;bmLocale=en_US">Polaroid</a> announced
that after this year, it will no longer manufacture film for its cameras. You can
listen to the <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19115854">National
Public Radio </a>interview live on the web.<br /><br />
Edwin H. Land established the company back in 1937. It offered photographers instant
gratification: Take a picture, wait a few minutes and you could see your picture.
Now digital has replaced the days of watching the print develop in front of your eyes.
Follow the ups and downs of this trend-setting company on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaroid_Corporation">Wikipedia</a>.<br /><br />
I guess my husband and I will retire all our Polaroid cameras. My first one was called
the "Swinger" because it had a strap to hang from your wrist. It was a lot of fun
to use. 
<br /><br />
Got a question about your Polaroid pictures, submit them to me at <a href="mailto:mtaylor@taylorandstrong.com">mtaylor@taylorandstrong.com</a> or
ask them in the comment field below. 
<p></p></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=c782263e-20e9-4a01-a0a9-f5b271a5a0bc" />
      </body>
      <title>Polaroid News</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,c782263e-20e9-4a01-a0a9-f5b271a5a0bc.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2008/03/04/PolaroidNews.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Another photographic giant is shutting down production on one of its products.
In mid-February, &lt;a href="http://www.polaroid.com/us/index.jsp?co=us&amp;amp;bmLocale=en_US"&gt;Polaroid&lt;/a&gt; announced
that after this year, it will no longer manufacture film for its cameras. You can
listen to the &lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19115854"&gt;National
Public Radio &lt;/a&gt;interview live on the web.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Edwin H. Land established the company back in 1937. It offered photographers instant
gratification: Take a picture, wait a few minutes and you could see your picture.
Now digital has replaced the days of watching the print develop in front of your eyes.
Follow the ups and downs of this trend-setting company on &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaroid_Corporation"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I guess my husband and I will retire all our Polaroid cameras. My first one was called
the "Swinger" because it had a strap to hang from your wrist. It was a lot of fun
to use. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Got a question about your Polaroid pictures, submit them to me at &lt;a href="mailto:mtaylor@taylorandstrong.com"&gt;mtaylor@taylorandstrong.com&lt;/a&gt; or
ask them in the comment field below. 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=c782263e-20e9-4a01-a0a9-f5b271a5a0bc" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,c782263e-20e9-4a01-a0a9-f5b271a5a0bc.aspx</comments>
      <category>photo news</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>