<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Photo Detective with Maureen A. Taylor - enhanced images</title>
    <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/</link>
    <description />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>F+W Media</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:15:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>mtaylor@taylorandstrong.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>mtaylor@taylorandstrong.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=ae7462e4-e90c-4c6c-94c8-bb8f5281bcc7</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,ae7462e4-e90c-4c6c-94c8-bb8f5281bcc7.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,ae7462e4-e90c-4c6c-94c8-bb8f5281bcc7.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=ae7462e4-e90c-4c6c-94c8-bb8f5281bcc7</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>In response to <a href="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/HandColored+Photographs.aspx" target="blank">last
week's column on tinted pictures</a>, Barbara Stone sent in this oversize hand colored
photo of a young woman. 
<br /><br /><img src="content/binary/barbaraIMG_4138.jpg" alt="barbaraIMG_4138.jpg" border="0" height="434" width="326" /><br /><br />
It's on canvas and framed in a gorgeous gold setting. According to Stone is was found
in a collection of pictures of her father's Irish relatives who lived in Ansonia,
Conn. The problem is: Where was it taken and who is it? 
<br /><br />
I own a similar type image of my great-grandfather. His picture and the one owned
by Stone are charcoal-enhanced photographs. Each is likely based on a much smaller
original photograph. 
<br /><br />
In the late 19th century, photographers advertised that they could produce this enhanced
enlargements. The wide upper sleeves on her dress, the design of the bodice and her
hairstyle all provide a time frame for the image of the late 1890s. Stone wrote that
it might depict Jane (Lomasney) Coppinger from Kilworth, County Cork, and wondered
if it was made it the United States or in Ireland. 
<br /><br />
Figuring out if this is Jane is a matter of finding out her birth date to see if she's
a young woman in the late 1890s. If that's the case, verifying her immigration year
could identify the place of origin for this picture. It's a case of adding up the
facts. Do the details of her life (i.e. her age) and immigration information support
Stone's hypothesis? I'll let you know if I find out.<br /><br />
BTW, there is a new Web site for English photo reunions. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92Wuu3X8i88" target="blank">You
can watch my YouTube video about it</a>. If one of your ancestors lived in Hull, England,
you'll definitely want to take the Hull Challenge. 
</div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=ae7462e4-e90c-4c6c-94c8-bb8f5281bcc7" />
      </body>
      <title>Picture Origins: Overseas or in America?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,ae7462e4-e90c-4c6c-94c8-bb8f5281bcc7.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2009/03/30/PictureOriginsOverseasOrInAmerica.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:15:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In response to &lt;a href="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/HandColored+Photographs.aspx" target="blank"&gt;last
week's column on tinted pictures&lt;/a&gt;, Barbara Stone sent in this oversize hand colored
photo of a young woman. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="content/binary/barbaraIMG_4138.jpg" alt="barbaraIMG_4138.jpg" border="0" height="434" width="326"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It's on canvas and framed in a gorgeous gold setting. According to Stone is was found
in a collection of pictures of her father's Irish relatives who lived in Ansonia,
Conn. The problem is: Where was it taken and who is it? 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I own a similar type image of my great-grandfather. His picture and the one owned
by Stone are charcoal-enhanced photographs. Each is likely based on a much smaller
original photograph. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the late 19th century, photographers advertised that they could produce this enhanced
enlargements. The wide upper sleeves on her dress, the design of the bodice and her
hairstyle all provide a time frame for the image of the late 1890s. Stone wrote that
it might depict Jane (Lomasney) Coppinger from Kilworth, County Cork, and wondered
if it was made it the United States or in Ireland. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Figuring out if this is Jane is a matter of finding out her birth date to see if she's
a young woman in the late 1890s. If that's the case, verifying her immigration year
could identify the place of origin for this picture. It's a case of adding up the
facts. Do the details of her life (i.e. her age) and immigration information support
Stone's hypothesis? I'll let you know if I find out.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
BTW, there is a new Web site for English photo reunions. &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92Wuu3X8i88" target="blank"&gt;You
can watch my YouTube video about it&lt;/a&gt;. If one of your ancestors lived in Hull, England,
you'll definitely want to take the Hull Challenge. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=ae7462e4-e90c-4c6c-94c8-bb8f5281bcc7" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,ae7462e4-e90c-4c6c-94c8-bb8f5281bcc7.aspx</comments>
      <category>1890s photos</category>
      <category>enhanced images</category>
      <category>women</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=b90ceaee-b713-442f-946e-5c3f8180a6ed</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,b90ceaee-b713-442f-946e-5c3f8180a6ed.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,b90ceaee-b713-442f-946e-5c3f8180a6ed.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b90ceaee-b713-442f-946e-5c3f8180a6ed</wfw:commentRss>
      <title>Picture Origins: Overseas or in America</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,b90ceaee-b713-442f-946e-5c3f8180a6ed.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2009/03/29/PictureOriginsOverseasOrInAmerica.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:37:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size="3" face="Times New Roman"&gt;In response to last week's&lt;a href="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/HandColored+Photographs.aspx"&gt; column&lt;/a&gt; on
tinted pictures, Barbara Stone sent in this oversize hand colored photo of a young
woman.&amp;nbsp; It's on canvas and framed in a gorgeous gold setting.&amp;nbsp; According
to Stone is was found in a collection of pictures of her father's Irish relatives
who lived in Ansonia, Connecticut. The problem is: Where was it taken and who is it?&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;link rel="File-List" href="file:///C:%5CUsers%5Cmaureen%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_filelist.xml"&gt;
&lt;link rel="themeData" href="file:///C:%5CUsers%5Cmaureen%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_themedata.thmx"&gt;
&lt;link rel="colorSchemeMapping" href="file:///C:%5CUsers%5Cmaureen%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_colorschememapping.xml"&gt;&gt;
&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3" face="Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13.5pt; font-family: &amp;quot;Verdana&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;quot;; color: black;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13.5pt; font-family: &amp;quot;Verdana&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;quot;; color: black;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/barbaraIMG_4138.jpg" alt="barbaraIMG_4138.jpg" width="288" border="0" height="384"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3" face="Times New Roman"&gt;I own a similar type image of my great-grandfather. His picture and the one owned by Stone are charcoal enhanced photographs.&amp;nbsp; Both are likely based on a much smaller original photograph. In the late nineteenth century photographers advertised that they could produce this enhanced enlargements.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3" face="Times New Roman"&gt;The wide upper sleeves on her dress, the design of the bodice and her hairstyle all provide a time frame for the image of the late 1890s.&amp;nbsp; Stone wrote that it might depict Jane (Lomasney) Coppinger from Kilworth, Co. Cork and wondered if it was made it the United States or in Ireland.&amp;nbsp; Figuring out if this is Jane is a matter of finding out her birth date to see if she's a young woman in the late 1890s. If that's the case, then verifying her immigration year could identify the place of origin for this picture. It's a case of adding up the facts.&amp;nbsp; Do the details of her life (i.e. her age) and immigration information support Stone's hypothesis?&amp;nbsp; I'll let you know if I find out. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3" face="Times New Roman"&gt;BTW--there is a new &lt;a href="http://www.whatsthatpicture.com"&gt;website&lt;/a&gt; for English photo reunions. You can watch my &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92Wuu3X8i88&amp;amp;feature=channel_page"&gt;YouTube video&lt;/a&gt; about it.&amp;nbsp; If one of your ancestors lived in Hull, England, you'll definitely want to take the Hull Challenge. &lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13.5pt; font-family: &amp;quot;Verdana&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;quot;; color: black;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13.5pt; font-family: &amp;quot;Verdana&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;quot;; color: black;"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=b90ceaee-b713-442f-946e-5c3f8180a6ed"/&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,b90ceaee-b713-442f-946e-5c3f8180a6ed.aspx</comments>
      <category>1890s photos</category>
      <category>enhanced images</category>
      <category>Photo-sharing sites</category>
      <category>women</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=4982fb90-c3b4-4afd-9f20-3f18445582af</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,4982fb90-c3b4-4afd-9f20-3f18445582af.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,4982fb90-c3b4-4afd-9f20-3f18445582af.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=4982fb90-c3b4-4afd-9f20-3f18445582af</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>Do you own any photographs that are hand-colored? 
<br /><br />
These tinted enhancements range from delicately shaded pink lips and gold jewelry
to elaborate coloring that obscures the image and transforms a photograph into a painting. 
<br /><br />
Powders, paints, crayons and pastels were all used to make photographs look more lifelike.
Some photographers hired artists to apply the color, while others attempted to do
the job themselves. The final results were mixed based on the skill of the person
laying down the color. 
<br /><br />
The history of photography is full of examples of hand-colored images from the early
daguerreotype period to the digitally colored images of today. 
<br /><br /><img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/firemenedit3g06607v.jpg" alt="firemenedit3g06607v.jpg" border="0" height="523" width="420" /><br /><br />
Here's an example from the <a href="http://loc.gov" target="blank">Library of Congress</a>.
It's three men from the Phoenix Fire Company and Mechanic Fire Company of Charleston,
SC.  Isn't it beautiful? The photographer tinted their jackets, but the red color
most attracts the eye.   
<br /><br />
It was taken c. 1855 by Tyler &amp; Co. Additional information on Tyler can be found
in <a href="http://www.daguerreotype.com" target="blank">Craig's Daguerreian Registry</a>. 
<br /><br />
In John Comstock's <i>A System of Natural Philosphy</i> (1852), there are details
about how this tint might've been added and a bit of background on coloring in general:<br /><blockquote>Coloring daguerreotype pictures is an American invention, and has been
considered a secret, though at the present time it is done with more or less success
by most artists.  
<br /></blockquote><blockquote>The color consists of the oxyds of several metals, ground
to an impalpable powder. They are laid on in a dry state, with soft camel-hair pencils,
after the process of gilding. The plate is then heated by which they are fixed. This
is a very delicate part of the art, and should not be undertaken by those who have
not a good eye, and a light hand. 
<br /></blockquote>Comstock received these details from a Mr. N.G. Burgess of 192 Broadway,
NY, and claimed that "he was an experienced and expert artist in this line." Nathan
Burgess also is in <a href="http://www.daguerreotype.com" target="blank">Craig's Daguerreian
Registry</a>. It appears he was one of the earliest daguerreotypists in this country. 
<br /><br />
Note: If you were looking at the original of this image, you'd have to view the image
at an angle. This is a key characteristic of a daguerreotype. They were also reversed. 
<br /><br />
If you have a hand-colored image you'd like to share, <a href="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/How+To+Submit+Your+Mystery+Photo+To+The+Photo+Detective.aspx" target="blank">see
the photo submission guidelines</a>.<br /><p></p></div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=4982fb90-c3b4-4afd-9f20-3f18445582af" />
      </body>
      <title>Hand-Colored Photographs</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,4982fb90-c3b4-4afd-9f20-3f18445582af.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2009/03/23/HandColoredPhotographs.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Do you own any photographs that are hand-colored? 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
These tinted enhancements range from delicately shaded pink lips and gold jewelry
to elaborate coloring that obscures the image and transforms a photograph into a painting. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Powders, paints, crayons and pastels were all used to make photographs look more lifelike.
Some photographers hired artists to apply the color, while others attempted to do
the job themselves. The final results were mixed based on the skill of the person
laying down the color. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The history of photography is full of examples of hand-colored images from the early
daguerreotype period to the digitally colored images of today. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/content/binary/firemenedit3g06607v.jpg" alt="firemenedit3g06607v.jpg" border="0" height="523" width="420"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here's an example from the &lt;a href="http://loc.gov" target="blank"&gt;Library of Congress&lt;/a&gt;.
It's three men from the Phoenix Fire Company and Mechanic Fire Company of Charleston,
SC.&amp;nbsp; Isn't it beautiful? The photographer tinted their jackets, but the red color
most attracts the eye.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It was taken c. 1855 by Tyler &amp;amp; Co. Additional information on Tyler can be found
in &lt;a href="http://www.daguerreotype.com" target="blank"&gt;Craig's Daguerreian Registry&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In John Comstock's &lt;i&gt;A System of Natural Philosphy&lt;/i&gt; (1852), there are details
about how this tint might've been added and a bit of background on coloring in general:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Coloring daguerreotype pictures is an American invention, and has been
considered a secret, though at the present time it is done with more or less success
by most artists.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The color consists of the oxyds of several metals, ground
to an impalpable powder. They are laid on in a dry state, with soft camel-hair pencils,
after the process of gilding. The plate is then heated by which they are fixed. This
is a very delicate part of the art, and should not be undertaken by those who have
not a good eye, and a light hand. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Comstock received these details from a Mr. N.G. Burgess of 192 Broadway,
NY, and claimed that "he was an experienced and expert artist in this line." Nathan
Burgess also is in &lt;a href="http://www.daguerreotype.com" target="blank"&gt;Craig's Daguerreian
Registry&lt;/a&gt;. It appears he was one of the earliest daguerreotypists in this country. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Note: If you were looking at the original of this image, you'd have to view the image
at an angle. This is a key characteristic of a daguerreotype. They were also reversed. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you have a hand-colored image you'd like to share, &lt;a href="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/How+To+Submit+Your+Mystery+Photo+To+The+Photo+Detective.aspx" target="blank"&gt;see
the photo submission guidelines&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=4982fb90-c3b4-4afd-9f20-3f18445582af" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,4982fb90-c3b4-4afd-9f20-3f18445582af.aspx</comments>
      <category>1850s photos</category>
      <category>enhanced images</category>
      <category>men</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=d2fd3e51-7c8c-4669-a1c3-47f732d4d10f</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,d2fd3e51-7c8c-4669-a1c3-47f732d4d10f.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,d2fd3e51-7c8c-4669-a1c3-47f732d4d10f.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=d2fd3e51-7c8c-4669-a1c3-47f732d4d10f</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <a href="http://www.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Could+This+Happen+To+Your+Family+History+Treasures+.aspx">Last
week I wrote about Carolanne’s portraits of her relatives Laura Gilman and her husband
James Wyatt Weed</a>. Here’s a third, unidentified, picture. 
<br /><br />
Behind each picture is a story, and Caroleann's three portraits are no different.
Photo identification techniques can tell you when a person sat for a picture, but
it’s the historical and genealogical research that fills in the details of their lives.
In this case, Carolanne knows the birth dates of Laura, James and their four children,
Flora (b. 1874), Alvah (b. 1879), Wyatt James (b. 1881) and Addie (1883). The family
folklore and her research reveal a tragic tale you’d never guess by looking at their
lovely pictures. 
<br /><br /><img src="content/binary/101407.JPG" border="0" height="509" width="381" /><br /><br />
First, let’s identify the baby in this crayon portrait. I’d estimate this child is
around 2 years old.  The child is wearing a dress, but the outfit and short hair
confirm the sex and dates.  During the 1880s, little boys wore “masculine” dresses
like this one, featuring less trim than by girls’ dresses. Wide lace collars were
in vogue, too. The short hair could be due the toddler’s age or because his mother
cut it short to mimic men’s styles. 
<br /><br />
Notice the ball in his right hand. It’s either a photographer’s trick to help him
sit still, or a treasured possession. 
<br /><br />
The artist or photographer who enhanced the image with charcoal did a good job around
the face but didn’t accurately draw the hands and feet. Since the artistic style is
similar to that of <a href="http://www.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Could+This+Happen+To+Your+Family+History+Treasures+.aspx">his
parent’s pictures,</a> the work was probably done by the same studio. 
<br /><br />
Therefore, if this portrait depicts Alvah, it was created around 1881, and if it’s
his brother, it dates from about 1883. Either identification is possible. 
<br /><br />
There is also an emotional story to this image. Around 1910, Wyatt moved to California
with a friend to “hook up electricity.” The next year, his mother received a telegram
that “Wyatt J Weed accidentally killed eighty dollars in bank wire instructions."
 <br /><br />
In a second missive from Wyatt’s friend, his mother learned he died when he “took
hold of a drop light in a dark cellar” and that the embalmer wanted seventy-five dollars
for a metal-lined box and casket. The friend offered to arrange transportation home.
His sister Addie remembered it cost $172 to bring Wyatt back to Maine and that the
loss of her son changed Laura forever. Carolanne thinks that's why the grief-stricken
mother would’ve kept this portrait of Wyatt, rather than another son, but the clothing
clues suggest it could be either boy. 
<br /><br />
A picture is sometimes just an icon for the greater tale of your family. Take time
to research the life of each person to fit their photograph into their life story.
Carolanne has. 
<br /></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=d2fd3e51-7c8c-4669-a1c3-47f732d4d10f" />
      </body>
      <title>Crayon-Enhanced Portrait of a Child</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,d2fd3e51-7c8c-4669-a1c3-47f732d4d10f.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2007/10/17/CrayonEnhancedPortraitOfAChild.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Could+This+Happen+To+Your+Family+History+Treasures+.aspx"&gt;Last
week I wrote about Carolanne’s portraits of her relatives Laura Gilman and her husband
James Wyatt Weed&lt;/a&gt;. Here’s a third, unidentified, picture. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Behind each picture is a story, and Caroleann's three portraits are no different.
Photo identification techniques can tell you when a person sat for a picture, but
it’s the historical and genealogical research that fills in the details of their lives.
In this case, Carolanne knows the birth dates of Laura, James and their four children,
Flora (b. 1874), Alvah (b. 1879), Wyatt James (b. 1881) and Addie (1883). The family
folklore and her research reveal a tragic tale you’d never guess by looking at their
lovely pictures. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="content/binary/101407.JPG" border="0" height="509" width="381"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
First, let’s identify the baby in this crayon portrait. I’d estimate this child is
around 2 years old.&amp;nbsp; The child is wearing a dress, but the outfit and short hair
confirm the sex and dates.&amp;nbsp; During the 1880s, little boys wore “masculine” dresses
like this one, featuring less trim than by girls’ dresses. Wide lace collars were
in vogue, too. The short hair could be due the toddler’s age or because his mother
cut it short to mimic men’s styles. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Notice the ball in his right hand. It’s either a photographer’s trick to help him
sit still, or a treasured possession. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The artist or photographer who enhanced the image with charcoal did a good job around
the face but didn’t accurately draw the hands and feet. Since the artistic style is
similar to that of &lt;a href="http://www.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Could+This+Happen+To+Your+Family+History+Treasures+.aspx"&gt;his
parent’s pictures,&lt;/a&gt; the work was probably done by the same studio. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Therefore, if this portrait depicts Alvah, it was created around 1881, and if it’s
his brother, it dates from about 1883. Either identification is possible. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There is also an emotional story to this image. Around 1910, Wyatt moved to California
with a friend to “hook up electricity.” The next year, his mother received a telegram
that “Wyatt J Weed accidentally killed eighty dollars in bank wire instructions."
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In a second missive from Wyatt’s friend, his mother learned he died when he “took
hold of a drop light in a dark cellar” and that the embalmer wanted seventy-five dollars
for a metal-lined box and casket. The friend offered to arrange transportation home.
His sister Addie remembered it cost $172 to bring Wyatt back to Maine and that the
loss of her son changed Laura forever. Carolanne thinks that's why the grief-stricken
mother would’ve kept this portrait of Wyatt, rather than another son, but the clothing
clues suggest it could be either boy. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A picture is sometimes just an icon for the greater tale of your family. Take time
to research the life of each person to fit their photograph into their life story.
Carolanne has. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=d2fd3e51-7c8c-4669-a1c3-47f732d4d10f" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,d2fd3e51-7c8c-4669-a1c3-47f732d4d10f.aspx</comments>
      <category>1880s photos</category>
      <category>children</category>
      <category>enhanced images</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=582a3a10-0c79-4088-bc28-ff490ef9afcf</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,582a3a10-0c79-4088-bc28-ff490ef9afcf.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,582a3a10-0c79-4088-bc28-ff490ef9afcf.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=582a3a10-0c79-4088-bc28-ff490ef9afcf</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>Before diving into this week’s identification, I have a question for you: Have
you specified in your will who’ll receive your heritage photos after you’re no longer
here? If not, your relatives could find themselves in a battle. 
<br /><br />
Carolanne, the owner of this week’s photo, has spent 17 years trying to gain ownership
of her great-aunt’s pictures and family history materials. When Addie Mattilda Weed
died in 1990 at age 106, the tenants in her house gave her manuscripts to a university
and kept her photos. 
<br /><br />
Carolanne, Addie’s closest living relative, finally got the photos, but she’s still
battling the university—which currently expects her to pay even to copy the papers.
So, make sure you’ve planned for the future of your genealogy collection.<br /><br />
On to Carolanne’s question: Who are these people? 
<br />
She hopes they’re Addie’s mother, Laura Gilman (1844-1926), and father, James Wyatt
Weed (1839-1888).  
<br /><br /><img src="content/binary/100807a.JPG" border="0" height="272" width="204" />     <img src="content/binary/101507.JPG" border="0" height="273" width="205" /><br />
I think Carolanne’s right. Addie lived her whole life in one house—birth to death.
Since these photos were in that house among her belongings, they’re likely her close
relatives. Also, this couple is the right age to be her parents. 
<br /><br />
That’s easy, but as usual, there are other questions: When were these images created,
and what format are they?  <br /><br />
Both are photographs enhanced with charcoal. Photographers generally took pictures
first, then enlarged and enhanced them—turning an ordinary cabinet-style picture into
a piece of art. I happen own a similar-style image in a large gilt frame. The frames
for these images are missing, and if there were smaller photos, those are unfortunately
lost as well. 
<br />
     
<br />
From about 1869 to 1875 women wore high, ruffled collars, long curls and ties at the
neckline just as in this portrait. Notice her neck ribbon. Since Gilman and Weed married
in 1873, it’s possible this is an engagement or wedding portrait.  <br /><br />
It’s much more difficult to date the picture of her husband, due to the sparse costume
details in his picture. If his picture was done at the same time as Addie’s, he’d
be 34 years old. His beard resembles the untrimmed facial hair men wore in the mid-1870s.
Unlike his wife’s unwrinkled face, he has lines around his eyes, suggesting hard work
that required he squint into the sun. According to the 1880 US census, James Weed
worked in a mill, but I imagine he also spent time outdoors in his native Maine. 
<br /><br />
Caroleann sent a third family photo. I’ll tackle that next week, with a few more things
to say about the three images. ‘Til then…
</div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=582a3a10-0c79-4088-bc28-ff490ef9afcf" />
      </body>
      <title>Could this happen to your family history treasures? </title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/PermaLink,guid,582a3a10-0c79-4088-bc28-ff490ef9afcf.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/2007/10/10/CouldThisHappenToYourFamilyHistoryTreasures.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:50:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Before diving into this week’s identification, I have a question for you: Have
you specified in your will who’ll receive your heritage photos after you’re no longer
here? If not, your relatives could find themselves in a battle. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Carolanne, the owner of this week’s photo, has spent 17 years trying to gain ownership
of her great-aunt’s pictures and family history materials. When Addie Mattilda Weed
died in 1990 at age 106, the tenants in her house gave her manuscripts to a university
and kept her photos. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Carolanne, Addie’s closest living relative, finally got the photos, but she’s still
battling the university—which currently expects her to pay even to copy the papers.
So, make sure you’ve planned for the future of your genealogy collection.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On to Carolanne’s question: Who are these people? 
&lt;br&gt;
She hopes they’re Addie’s mother, Laura Gilman (1844-1926), and father, James Wyatt
Weed (1839-1888).&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="content/binary/100807a.JPG" border="0" height="272" width="204"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;img src="content/binary/101507.JPG" border="0" height="273" width="205"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think Carolanne’s right. Addie lived her whole life in one house—birth to death.
Since these photos were in that house among her belongings, they’re likely her close
relatives. Also, this couple is the right age to be her parents. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That’s easy, but as usual, there are other questions: When were these images created,
and what format are they? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Both are photographs enhanced with charcoal. Photographers generally took pictures
first, then enlarged and enhanced them—turning an ordinary cabinet-style picture into
a piece of art. I happen own a similar-style image in a large gilt frame. The frames
for these images are missing, and if there were smaller photos, those are unfortunately
lost as well. 
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;br&gt;
From about 1869 to 1875 women wore high, ruffled collars, long curls and ties at the
neckline just as in this portrait. Notice her neck ribbon. Since Gilman and Weed married
in 1873, it’s possible this is an engagement or wedding portrait. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It’s much more difficult to date the picture of her husband, due to the sparse costume
details in his picture. If his picture was done at the same time as Addie’s, he’d
be 34 years old. His beard resembles the untrimmed facial hair men wore in the mid-1870s.
Unlike his wife’s unwrinkled face, he has lines around his eyes, suggesting hard work
that required he squint into the sun. According to the 1880 US census, James Weed
worked in a mill, but I imagine he also spent time outdoors in his native Maine. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Caroleann sent a third family photo. I’ll tackle that next week, with a few more things
to say about the three images. ‘Til then…
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/aggbug.ashx?id=582a3a10-0c79-4088-bc28-ff490ef9afcf" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/photodetectiveblog/CommentView,guid,582a3a10-0c79-4088-bc28-ff490ef9afcf.aspx</comments>
      <category>1860s photos</category>
      <category>1870s photos</category>
      <category>enhanced images</category>
      <category>men</category>
      <category>women</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>