Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories
August, 2014 (18)
July, 2014 (16)
June, 2014 (18)
May, 2014 (17)
April, 2014 (17)
March, 2014 (17)
February, 2014 (16)
January, 2014 (16)
December, 2013 (11)
November, 2013 (15)
October, 2013 (19)
September, 2013 (20)
August, 2013 (23)
July, 2013 (24)
June, 2013 (14)
May, 2013 (25)
April, 2013 (20)
March, 2013 (24)
February, 2013 (25)
January, 2013 (20)
December, 2012 (19)
November, 2012 (25)
October, 2012 (22)
September, 2012 (24)
August, 2012 (24)
July, 2012 (21)
June, 2012 (22)
May, 2012 (28)
April, 2012 (44)
March, 2012 (36)
February, 2012 (36)
January, 2012 (27)
December, 2011 (22)
November, 2011 (29)
October, 2011 (52)
September, 2011 (26)
August, 2011 (26)
July, 2011 (17)
June, 2011 (31)
May, 2011 (32)
April, 2011 (31)
March, 2011 (31)
February, 2011 (28)
January, 2011 (27)
December, 2010 (34)
November, 2010 (26)
October, 2010 (27)
September, 2010 (27)
August, 2010 (31)
July, 2010 (23)
June, 2010 (30)
May, 2010 (23)
April, 2010 (30)
March, 2010 (30)
February, 2010 (30)
January, 2010 (23)
December, 2009 (19)
November, 2009 (27)
October, 2009 (30)
September, 2009 (25)
August, 2009 (26)
July, 2009 (33)
June, 2009 (32)
May, 2009 (30)
April, 2009 (39)
March, 2009 (35)
February, 2009 (21)
January, 2009 (29)
December, 2008 (15)
November, 2008 (15)
October, 2008 (25)
September, 2008 (30)
August, 2008 (26)
July, 2008 (26)
June, 2008 (22)
May, 2008 (27)
April, 2008 (20)
March, 2008 (20)
February, 2008 (19)
January, 2008 (22)
December, 2007 (21)
November, 2007 (26)
October, 2007 (20)
September, 2007 (17)
August, 2007 (23)
July, 2007 (17)
June, 2007 (13)
May, 2007 (7)

Search

Archives

<September 2014>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011

More Links








# Monday, July 01, 2013
Ancestry.com Surveys Users on Old Search
Posted by Diane

In light of the online commentary over the impending discontinuation of Old Search, Ancestry.com has set up a survey to gather your feedback on the site's search function.

Ancestry.com spokesperson Matthew Deighton said the company wants Old Search users to know that it plans to preserve the functionality of the Old Search, and merge it into one consolidated search experience.

In a note to distributed to bloggers Friday, Ancestry.com asked users to take the survey. It also linked to an educational video about the current (aka "New") search experience and to an article with a side-by-side explanation of achieving the same results with New Search as Old Search.

The note also says that some of the functions Old Search fans have lamented losing are present in New Search (I added the bullets to this quote):
"Many of the recent concerns and comments have cited functionality that actually exists in current search, as well as in old search—specifically:
  • Our current search experience allows users to view search results as a list of ranked records or as a consolidated list of categories.
  • Our current search experience allows users to do 'Exact Match' searches.
  • Our current search experience allows users to specify a 'Collection Priority' to filter results by country. "
Read Ancestry.com's note here and take the survey here.


Ancestry.com
Monday, July 01, 2013 12:58:29 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [1]
Thursday, July 04, 2013 11:38:35 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
I ABSOLUTELY do NOT use "NEW SEARCH". It give me far too much irrelevant people and I spend too much time weeding them out to find the ones that ARE relevant. Old search is much better, quick to the point, and I find who I want in minutes instead of hours! I am NOT happy with the decision to get rid of Old Search as it will make any of my searches that much harder with too many non relevant people and non useful information.
Jacqueline Lubinski
Comments are closed.