Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2009 (7) |
| October, 2009 (30) |
| September, 2009 (25) |
| August, 2009 (26) |
| July, 2009 (33) |
| June, 2009 (32) |
| May, 2009 (30) |
| April, 2009 (39) |
| March, 2009 (35) |
| February, 2009 (21) |
| January, 2009 (29) |
| December, 2008 (15) |
| November, 2008 (15) |
| October, 2008 (25) |
| September, 2008 (30) |
| August, 2008 (26) |
| July, 2008 (26) |
| June, 2008 (22) |
| May, 2008 (27) |
| April, 2008 (20) |
| March, 2008 (20) |
| February, 2008 (19) |
| January, 2008 (22) |
| December, 2007 (21) |
| November, 2007 (26) |
| October, 2007 (20) |
| September, 2007 (17) |
| August, 2007 (23) |
| July, 2007 (17) |
| June, 2007 (13) |
| May, 2007 (7) |
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
More Links
|
 Thursday, March 19, 2009
Ancestry.com Additions Help You Find Living Relatives
Posted by Diane
Funny coincidence. I was sitting here proofing the final version of our July 2009 Family Tree Magazine article on reverse genealogy (searching for living relatives) when I got an announcement from Ancestry.com about its new/updated collections of recent records. Which could help you find, say, a cousin or second cousin. Now, through a partnership with the people finder MyLife.com (formerly Reunion.com), your Ancestry.com search results may include links to MyLife.com’s public information profiles on more than 700 million living people. But wait, there’s more: In the next week or two, Ancestry.com will replace its current US public records database with one containing more than 525 million names, addresses, ages and possible family relationships of US residents between about 1950 and 1990. Finally, Ancestry.com launched an upgraded collection of obituaries extracted from papers all over the world—helpful because survivors named in relatives’ obituaries may be cousins. (Also see last week's post about Ancestry.com's "1940 census substitute.") See the details on the Ancestry.com blog. Ancestry.com | Genealogy Web Sites | Public Records
Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:50:40 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Thursday, March 05, 2009
Cologne Archive Collapse: All is Not Lost!
Posted by Grace
When the Stadtarchiv Köln—or City Archive of Cologne—collapsed Tuesday afternoon, two people died, surrounding buildings were irretrievably damaged, and more than a thousand years of records were buried in the rubble. The archive contained 65,000 documents, the oldest coming from the year 922. The archive's holdings—more than 16 miles of files—included tens of thousands of maps, photos, posters and one-of-a-kind artifacts from the Middle Ages. The collection was valued at $500 million, according to Welt. The city archive, which first found a place in Cologne city hall in 1406, withstood World War II with no losses. Officials say the building fell into a crater created by work on a nearby subway line. The building that collapsed was built in 1971. According to Wikipedia, it was built with an estimated service life of only 30 years. The archive reached its holding capacity in 1996; some material has been removed for storage elsewhere. While emergency workers attempted to stabilize the building with concrete, about 100 volunteers have pitched in to save valuable documents from the rubble since Tuesday night, according to a city press release. A small portion of the archives was in an unharmed area of the building. Rain is expected over the next few days, so a temporary roof will be set up over the collapse site to attempt to save more documents. Hamburg genealogist Andrea Bentschneider did research at the Cologne archive once and describes its holdings as "gigantic." The collapse comes at an especially bad time, she says, because German privacy law recently changed to allow easier access to civil records. The city archive of Cologne had announced that as of this month, all death records up to 1978, marriage records before 1928 and birth records before 1898 would be available for research without restriction. "We can only hope that these civil records as well as all other records were secured and saved on microfilm or a similar medium. Otherwise 1,000 years of Cologne's history may be lost forever," Bentschneider says. It seems that much of the archive's content may be safe. Welt reports that former city archive head says a large part of the archive’s pre-1945 files were microfilmed; the backups are stored in the Barbarastollen archive in the Black Forest. And FamilySearch filmed 171 rolls of film from the Cologne archive in 1984, says public affairs manager Paul Nauta. The library has been able to help other archives before by providing copies of the lost documents. FamilySearch’s holdings include these items from the Cologne archive: - Genealogy and coast of arms 1350-1880
- Tax lists 1487-1703
- Orphans house registers 1592-1788
- Soldier pay records 1552-1613
- Court records, inheritance and land 1220-1798
- Court minutes 1413-1652
- Town council minutes 1440-1653
"This is one of the clarion calls for why preservation services offered by FamilySearch and other like organizations can be so critical. Most genealogy consumers are aware of the convenient access value, but the tragedy of the Cologne archive reiterates the value for preservation," Nauta says. Historic preservation | Libraries and Archives | Public Records | Vital Records
Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:39:31 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Ohio County Gets Grant to Digitize Vital Records
Posted by Diane
Ancestry.com and FamilySearch are continuing their collaboration by cosponsoring a records digitization grant just awarded to the Probate Division of the Summit County Common Pleas Court in Akron, Ohio. The grant, administered by the National Association of Government Archive and Records Administrators, is worth $150,000—but it’ll be delivered in the form of services rather than money. FamilySearch will digitize 550,000 individuals' Summit County marriage records (1840 to 1980), 46,000-plus birth records (pre-1908) and more than 22,000 death records (also pre-1908). Ancestry.com will create an index linked to the images that’ll be free on the probate court’s Web site, FamilySearch and Ancestry.com. The project should be completed by the end of next year. Ancestry.com | FamilySearch | Public Records
Tuesday, October 07, 2008 4:45:21 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Thursday, September 18, 2008
Footnote to Digitize Homesteaders' Case Files
Posted by Diane
Historical records subscription service Footnote is embarking upon a project to post hundreds of thousands of US homesteading records online. Those records comprise land entry case files of people who claimed land under the Homestead Act of 1862, which opened the door for Americans to own government land in exchange for making improvements (such as residency, raising crops and planting trees). A land entry case file might include an application for land, witnesses’ testimonials, military records, citizenship papers and more. Footnote already contains 1,824 case files for people who registered homesteads at the Broken Bow, Neb., land office between 1890 and 1908. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) had microfilmed these; the rest of the General Land Office (GLO) records are still on paper. You can search land patents at the Bureau of Land Management’s GLO records site, but until your ancestor’s full land entry case file is digitized, you’ll need to order copies of it from NARA. If your ancestor applied for a land claim but didn’t “prove up,” the GLO database won’t contain a patent for him. NARA, the National Parks Service, the University of Nebraska—Lincoln and FamilySearch are partners in the digitization project. Footnote | Public Records | Research Tips
Thursday, September 18, 2008 9:17:44 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, September 10, 2008
SSDI Now Free on GenealogyBank, Too
Posted by Diane
Genealogy Web Sites | Public Records
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:27:42 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Thursday, August 14, 2008
Free Database of the Week: Early Indiana Marriages
Posted by Diane
This week’s free database is the Indiana State Library’s compilation of Indiana marriages through 1850. The late Dorothy Riker, an editor of The Hoosier Genealogist, started the project years ago. Volunteers have expanded the index to include marriage information through 1850 from courthouses in all counties that kept records, plus marriages mentioned in Quaker monthly meeting notes and St. Francis Xavier Church (in Vicennes) records. That adds up to around 330,000 marriages recorded in the database. You can search on the bride or groom. Results link to the person’s full name, name of his or her spouse, the date of the marriage and the county where it took place. Then you can look for the original record on Family History Library microfilm, or request it from the county court clerk (for contact information, go to the state courts Web site and use the Information by County dropdown menu on the left). Free Databases | Public Records
Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:36:33 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Monday, July 14, 2008
Free Chicago Vital Records Search Goes Online
Posted by Diane
In the March 2008 Family Tree Magazine Branching Out news column, we reported the clerk’s office in Cook County, Illinois—home to Chicago—was digitizing vital records for an online index. The project is finally finished, and you can search the index at the county's Genealogy Online Web site. Records date back to the 1880s (the Great Chicago Fire destroyed Cook County vital records from before 1871). First, you’ll need a free site registration. Then you can search birth and death certificates (older than 75 and 50 years, respectively), and marriage licenses (older than 50 years) by name and optional year range, or year and file number. Online genealogy guru Steve Morse has created an online form that gives you a sounds-like option for names. Matches show the person’s name, the record date and file number, with an option to download a copy of the record from the clerk's office for $15. You also could use the index information to order the microfilmed records from the Family History Library (run a keyword search of the online catalog on cook county and birth, marriage or death). The rental fee runs about $5 per roll; visit your local Family History Center to put in your request. ( Update: Click Comments below for expert tips on finding microfilmed Cook County vital records. Also, as a Family Tree Magazine E-mail Update newsletter reader pointed out, records are still being added to the CookCountyGenealogy database.)
Genealogy Web Sites | Public Records
Monday, July 14, 2008 2:20:10 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Friday, May 30, 2008
Legislators Discuss Copyright Reform
Posted by Grace
Ever been hassled by a clerk who demands you have permission from the photographer before making copies of a 100-year-old portrait? Under current copyright law, you'll likely lose the fight with Wal-Mart's photo department. (Read more about copyright quandaries here.) Legislation working its way through the House and the Senate focuses on so-called "orphan works"—creations whose copyright owners cannot be identified or located. When someone wants to use or reproduce a work that is likely copyrighted, they risk being held liable for infringement; this reform aims to free up orphan works for public use. Although artists have concerns about the current legislation, copyright reform would be a boon for family historians, museums, libraries and educational institutions. You can read more about the legislation on the website of our sister publication The Artist's Magazine here. Family Heirlooms | Historic preservation | Public Records
Friday, May 30, 2008 7:33:18 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Friday, May 23, 2008
USCIS Genealogy Service to Handle Citizenship Record Requests
Posted by Diane
A rule published in last Thursday’s Federal Register announces the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS, formerly the INS) will set up a fee-based Genealogy Program for responding to historical naturalization records requests. The rule takes effect Aug. 13. Currently, requests are processed through the Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) program, which according to the agency, delays fulfillment. The new program's fees will be $20 for an index search, $20 for record copies from microfilm, and $35 for copies of paper records. USCIS initially proposed charging $16 to $45 in April 2006. During the ensuing public comment period, the agency received 33 comments, 28 of them positive and many addressing fee levels. You can see a comments summary in the Federal Register announcement. Records you can request through this program include: - Naturalization Certificate Files (C-Files) dated Sept. 27, 1906, to April 1, 1956
- Alien Registration Forms on microfilm from Aug. 1, 1940 to March 31, 1944.
- Visa Files from July 1, 1924, to March 31, 1944
- Registry Files, from March 2, 1929 to March 31, 1944. These records document the creation of immigrant arrival records for persons who entered the United States prior to July 1, 1924, and for whom no arrival record could be found later.
- Alien-Files (A-Files) numbered below 8 million (as in A8000000). A–files were the official file for all immigration records after April 1, 1944. A–numbers ranging up to approximately 6 million correspond to aliens and immigrants who were in or entered the country between 1940 and 1945. A-numbers from 6 to 7 million date from about 1944 to May 1, 1951.
Documents dated after May 1, 1951, even if they’re in an A–File numbered below 8 million, are still subject to FOIA/PA restrictions.
Starting Aug. 13, you’ll be able to submit requests and credit card fee payments through the USGIS Web site on Form G–1041. For records naming someone born less than 100 years ago, you’ll have to prove the person is deceased. To request an index search, you’ll need to supply the immigrant’s full name and date and place of birth (at least as specific as a year). To request copies of records, you’ll need to provide a file number. Before the naturalization process was centralized under INS Sept. 27, 1906, local and federal courts kept citizenship records. See the May 2008 Family Tree Magazine and FamilyTreeMagazine.com for tips on finding pre- and post-1906 naturalization records. Family Tree Magazine articles | immigration records | Public Records
Friday, May 23, 2008 6:26:46 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Thursday, May 01, 2008
Missouri Opens Digitized Records Site
Posted by Diane
Missouri has launched a kind of one-stop shop for finding digitized historical records, abstracts and indexes from the state archives as well as libraries, universities, historical societies and other repositories throughout the state. The Missouri Digital Heritage Initiative divides collections by subject area (some record sets appear under multiple topics). Genealogical material is mostly in the Family and Faith category, but you’ll also want to explore Military Records, Newspapers, Sports and Recreation and other topics. (To see a lineup of all the record sets, click All Collections at the bottom of the Collections main page.) What will you see? Photos, maps, birth and death records, naturalization records, coroner’s inquest abstracts, a state supreme court case index, newspapers, Civil War letters and more. Here’s an ad page from an early 1900s Hannibal, Mo., city directory:  A few collections, including penitentiary and some land records, are still in progress. Some items are hosted on Missouri Digital Heritage; for other collections, you’ll be taken to partner sites. All the records are accessible free. The Missouri Digital Heritage Exhibits section links to online exhibits about the Missouri State Lunatic Asylum, the state fair, Lamar, Mo.-born Harry Truman’s Whistle Stop Campaign, and more. Another feature you won’t want to miss: The link to Missouri’s Local Records Inventory Database, where you can search inventories of local government records located primarily in county and municipal offices. You won’t find information about your ancestors in this particular database, but you can find out what office holds the records you need and what years are available. Search on a county name and keyword such as birth or probate. Genealogy Web Sites | Public Records | Social History
Thursday, May 01, 2008 2:59:12 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Monday, March 10, 2008
Ancestry.com Posts 500 German City Directories
Posted by Grace
Pay database Ancestry.com last week put online 500 German city directories, from Aachen to Zwickau.
Often overlooked as a genealogy resource, city directories can fill in
the blanks between censuses and help trace wandering ancestors. Ancestry's new collection includes business and professional directories, as well. From the main German Genealogy Records page, you can browse by state (mistakenly labeled as Counties in the drop-down menu) and by time period. Or try searching for a name in the fields on the left side of the page. The records include about 27 million names, according to the 24-7 Family History Circle blog, with most records from the late 1800s to mid-1900s. World Deluxe Membership is required to access the digitized directories. Click here to search them. International Genealogy | Public Records
Monday, March 10, 2008 7:46:16 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Search Site for Shelby County, Tenn., Family
Posted by Diane
Derrick Minck, register of deeds over in Shelby County, Tenn. (home of Memphis), e-mailed me about the plethora of genealogical records available on the Register’s Web site—somewhat unusual for a county government site. (Heads up, fellow Mac users: The site came up in Firefox but not in Safari.) If you’ve got Tennessee ancestors, stop by and look for - Property records: “We have indexes and images dating back to 1812,” Minck writes.
- GIS: You can search by name or address and see an aerial property photo linked to property data.
- Archives: Search Shelby County birth (1874-1906) marriage (1820-1910) and death (1848-1956), records—and yes, folks, most matches are linked to record images.
You also can search indexes for Tennessee marriages (1980-2005), divorces (1980-2005) and deaths (1949-2005), with links for ordering copies. Circuit (1893-2000) and chancery (1945-1997) court, naturalization (1856-1906) and Memphis 1865 census indexes are there, too.
Search each record set from the home page. Now staff is scanning Memphis city directories from 1859 to 1924, and Minck says they’re almost ready to post 1859 through 1881. Free Databases | Genealogy Web Sites | Libraries and Archives | Public Records
Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:01:51 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Monday, November 12, 2007
Report Urges Opening Adoptees' Birth Records
Posted by Diane
A report released today could help change how—and whether—adopted people can search for their family trees. The Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute examined whether adopted people, once they become adults, should have access to their original birth information. The report’s conclusion is "yes," and it urges all states to follow the eight (Alabama, Alaska, Delaware, Kansas, Maine, New Hampshire, Oregon and Tennessee) that already allow adults who were adopted to access their original birth records. The institute found that in states with open records, “most birthparents and adoptees handle any contact with maturity and respect.” You can read the report online and learn about the controversy surrounding opening birth records for adopted individuals at CNN.com. For many genealogists, an adopted parent or grandparent presents a research brick wall. According to the report, some states have restored access more narrowly, “typically to individuals who were adopted prior to the state's law sealing this information.” You can get help researching ancestral adoptions in the February 2007 Family Tree Magazine. Also see these links: Family Tree Magazine articles | Public Records
Monday, November 12, 2007 9:47:54 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Thursday, November 08, 2007
Pennsylvania Debates "Open" Records Bill
Posted by Diane
Pennsylvanians are debating a public records law that could make their state the least transparent in the country. HB 443 is an apparent attempt to bring public records law up-to-date, especially with respect to electronic records. This much-amended bill doesn’t, as some have reported, close all records with birth dates and addresses. Section 307, which lists records “deemed inaccessible,” makes an exception for personal information of deceased individuals: “The exemption under this paragraph relating to the disclosure of an individual's home address shall not apply to … any former address of a deceased person. The exemption under this paragraph relating to the disclosure of an individual's birth date shall not apply to the birth date of a deceased person.”
Read the full text of the law on the Pennsylvania legislature Web site. Currently, Pennsylvania vital records from the past 100 years, stored at the Division of Vital Records, are off limits to all but immediate family. You can request birth and death records prior to 1906 from the county where the event was recorded. But open-records advocates are denouncing HB 443 provisions that close much government agency correspondence and all government e-mail. That would make Pennsylvania the only state in the nation to take such a step. Other states are either explicitly opening e-mailed correspondence or they don't distinguish between electronic and paper records. You can read more about this debate on PassOpenRecords.org. Public Records
Thursday, November 08, 2007 1:18:57 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Monday, August 20, 2007
NARA Record Request Fees Go Up Oct. 1
Posted by Diane
We’ve known it was coming since the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) proposed last February to raise its reproduction fees for records you order. The good news is, it could’ve been worse. Effective Oct. 1, NARA will charge $75 for a Civil War pension file of up to 100 pages, plus $.65 per additional page (for longer files, staff will contact the requestor with a price quote before filling the order). NARA will charge $50 for pre-Civil War pension files regardless of page count, and $.75 per page to copy other records. While still a steep increase from the current $37 for a Civil War pension file, these fees are less than the $125 and $60 NARA originally proposed for Civil War and pre-Civil War pensions, respectively. (Still, save some cash by sending your request before October. The July 2007 Family Tree Magazine has instructions for ordering Civil War pensions.) In the Aug. 17 Federal Register,
national archivist Allen Weinstein attributes the change to public comment-inspired alterations in formulas for calculating document reproduction costs. Though its average pension file order was for 106 pages, 65 percent of orders were for files less than 100 pages. NARA received 1,281 comments during the 60-day comment period. About half the commenters identified themselves as genealogists. Looks like some comments hit a nerve by saying NARA’s proposal exaggerated actual copying costs. Weinstein wrote, “We firmly reject allegations that the fees are being raised capriciously for the purpose of supplementing funding for the agency or reducing the number of reproduction orders received.” He added it’s not practical to compare NARA’s photocopying costs with those of other entities because of archival document considerations including file retrieval and replacement, paper fragility, separating papers from fasteners, placing non-standard-size documents on copiers' glass platens and ensuring image legibility. Weinstein said NARA lacks funding for digitizing all the Civil War pension files. The agency considers them prime candidates for a digitization partnership, but “there is no near-term alternative to the current process for fulfilling fixed-fee order requests for reproductions of Civil War pension files.” Libraries and Archives | Public Records
Monday, August 20, 2007 3:25:08 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Monday, August 13, 2007
Holocaust records on the way
Posted by Grace
Next week, the first batch of digital copies of a major trove of Holocaust-era documents will be transferred to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, DC.
Allied forces discovered the files at the end of World War II, and they spent the next 60 years stashed away at the International Tracing Service in Bad Arolsen, Germany.
The museum says on its Web site the first installment includes 13.5 million pages, including records of camps, transportation, ghettos and arrest records. Later in the fall, the nearly 40 million index cards containing 17.5 million names will arrive.
Unfortunately, the archive won't be searchable online, but the museum plans to create a database that will let its own archivists quickly respond to your requests for information. When that database is up (watch the museum Web site for an announcement), queries from Holocaust survivors or on behalf of survivors will have priority.
Looking to explore your Jewish roots? Read more in the August 2006 issue of Family Tree Magazine, which you can order here. And check out Tracing the Tribe, a blog all about Jewish genealogy. Libraries and Archives | Public Records
Monday, August 13, 2007 10:14:03 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, July 18, 2007
New Group Aims to Keep Public Records Open
Posted by Diane
Five genealogists have started the Keep Genealogical Records Open Workgroup (KGROW). Their goal is to educate government officials and the public about the truth behind identity theft- and terror-related efforts to close public records. “We find there’s no evidence that open public records contribute to identity theft or terrorism to any measurable degree," says KGROW co-chair Jean Foster Kelley. Her statement echoes the December 2006 Family Tree Magazine special report on public records (available as a PDF file at www.familytreemagazine.com/dec06/publicrecords.pdf). Our research indicates public records pose little identity theft risk; the major culprits are stolen financial documents and corporate data breaches. States have passed 616 record closure laws since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. Now state public records laws must comply with the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which could negatively impact your attempts to find relatives’ birth and death records. States can—but aren’t required to—make concessions for genealogical research. KGROW, a project of the Association of Professional Genealogists (APG) Florida chapter, will prepare a position paper and solicit support from the APG, news media and other organizations. For more on public records access, see Family Tree Magazine's December 2006 special report. If you know of a threat to records access in your state (such as excessive fee hikes or record restrictions and closures), inform your fellow researchers on the new FamilyTreeMagazine.com Public Records Alert Forum. Public Records
Wednesday, July 18, 2007 6:54:25 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Friday, June 01, 2007
What's Wrong With Connecticut's Public Records Laws?
Posted by Diane
Connecticut-based Godfrey Memorial Library has become one of the state-approved genealogical societies whose members can get copies of Connecticut birth records. Access to that state's certified birth records less than 100 years old is limited to the person named in the certificate, legal guardians, spouses, grandparents, grandchildren, certain officials—and genealogy society members. I suppose we should be thankful the records aren’t closed altogether. But I'm going to complain anyway, and here's why: First, the law goes against the concept of public records. To get a record, you not only have to prove your identity and your relationship to the person, and pay a fee ($5 to request records from town offices; $15 to request them from the state), you also have to join a special club. Why should genealogists have any more right to a birth certificate than, say, engineers? Second, the state is, in effect, abdicating its own responsibility to safeguard these records. Instead, it's putting genealogy societies in charge of them. Do you think local genealogy societies are screening members and denying applications of potential terrorists and identity thieves? If someone wants to use your Connecticut birth record for nefarious purposes, do you really think he’ll be scared off by the Godfrey Library's $35 annual fee? What’s the point of closing the records if anyone can join a genealogical society and get any birth record? Public Records
Friday, June 01, 2007 10:40:43 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
|